Thursday, May 14, 2009
Government puts its case for licensing landlords
The Government set out yesterday their plans for the Private Rented Sector.
In their words:
"A major new package of measures to strengthen consumer protections for tenants living in private rented accommodation is being announced today by Housing Minister Margaret Beckett.
Landlord insurance brokers - widest choice - best rates
The Government wants to improve the quality of the private rented sector, by increasing professionalism, driving out bad landlords, and strengthening protections for tenants affected by repossessions."
A summary from the Telegraph is given below. In the spirit of freedom of speech we at Property Hawk believe that others should be given the chance to put their side of the arguement. We have added in our ODD NOTE about what the proposals actually mean.
The national register of landlords would be run by an independent organisation (ANOTHER COSTLY BUREAUCRACY - CAN WE AFFORD IT DO WE NEED IT) and landlords would have to register annually for a "nominal" fee (AT LEAST £50 - SO WE NEED TO REGISTER EACH YEAR TO LET OUT OUR OWN PROPERTY - WHY )to cover the administration costs,(WHY DO LANDLORDS HAVE TO PAY TO BE INCLUDED ON A POINTLESS LIST THAT WE DONT WANT) the Department for Communities & Local Government (CLG) said in a statement.
The register would be "light-touch" (POINTLESS) and would be web-based "to ensure that it does not become an unnecessary burden on the market". (UNDERMINE CIVIL LIBERTIES - IF I RENT OUT MY PROPERTY WHY DOES THE WHOLE WORLD NEED TO KNOW ABOUT IT)
Landlords would need to include their registration number on all tenancy agreements (SO LANDLORDS PUT A NUMBER ON A TENANCY AGREEMENT, HOW DOES THAT DRIVE UP STANDARDS )and could be removed from the register for persistent poor performance, such as failing to carry out essential repairs, or not protecting tenants' deposits,( LEGISLATION ALREADY EXIST THAT PROTECT TENANTS FROM THIS - DO THEY NOT READ THEIR OWN LEGISLATION) the CLG said.
The department added: "To ensure this does not become an unnecessary burden (SO THEY ADMIT IT WILL BE A BURDEN THEN) on the market the register will be web-based and will require minimal information such as the name of landlord, their address and address of the property being let. (HOW WILL THAT DRIVE UP STANDARDS - LAUGHABLE!)
"Introducing a light-touch national register of every private landlord in England [would] increase protection for both vulnerable tenants and good landlords." (HOW WILL IT PROTECT GOOD LANDLORDS. SO GOOD LANDLORDS PAY TO HAVE THEIR NAME ON A LIST THAT THEY DO NOT WANT IN ORDER TO PROTECT THEMSELVES FROM THEMSELVES! I'M SORRY THERE IS NO LOGIC THERE WHATS SO EVER!)
It also wants an improved complaints and redress procedure for tenants. The CLG said: "For the first time, the Government will look to set up a mechanism whereby tenants are able to register official complaints about substandard landlords, and if these complaints are substantial and proven then landlords may be removed from the national register." (WHO IS GOING TO ADMINISTER THIS - OH ANOTHER POINTLESS & COSTLY BUREAUCRACY THAT WILL HAVE TO BE PAID FOR OUT OF THE LANDLORD LICENCE - LOOKS LIKE ITS GOING TO COST A LOT MORE THAN £50 PA. OH BY THE WAY CAN'T TENANTS REFUSE TO PAY RENT IF THEY ARE NOT HAPPY WITH STANDARDS AND ULTIMATELY MOVE OUT. ISN'T THAT THE MOST EFFECTIVE FORM OF CONTROL 'REGULATION' OF ALL!)
The Government's consultation on the proposals will close on July 31.
DEAR MARGARET - YOU CLEARLY HAVE NOT GIVEN THIS SUBJECT ANY REAL THOUGHT AT ALL. VERY POOR EFFORT. PLEASE DO AGAIN.
MARK: 2 OUT OF 10 FAIL
For more on the landlord licence and to sign a petition saying NO to the landlord licence.
Free property management software, Free tenancy agreements
Usual total waste of money from this Govt. HMO L/Ls are already regulated. Tenants already have access to EHOs, CABx and if they are lucky to specialist Housing Advice Agencies.
ReplyDeleteThis will not improve housing conditions a jot.
Don't know. Have no problem with the Scotttish system. Seems to me that as long as we copy their's we should be fine.
ReplyDeleteNow, if agents had to register, that would be a fine thing!
Bill
PS Never trust anonymous.
Great - I've just heard a Minister arguing on Radio 4's PM against the reintroduction of the dog licence. Her reason was that blanket licensing was not needed because there was enough existing legislation to protect the animals welfare. In addition, there were problems with enforceability because the bad dog owners would just evade the licence. HMMM sounds familiar - so much for 'joined up thinking' and consistency!
ReplyDeleteIsn't this fee going to be tax deductible? In which case, it is the tenant and the taxpayer who will end up paying for it? And what happens if the LL loses their license - do all their tenants immediately get evicted? Why don't we introduce TENANT LICENSING?
ReplyDelete